Three and six grams supplementation of d-aspartic acid in resistance trained men
School of Science &
Health, University of Western Sydney, Campbelltown Campus, Penrith 2751,
NSW, Australia
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition 2015, 12:15
doi:10.1186/s12970-015-0078-7
The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://www.jissn.com/content/12/1/15
The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://www.jissn.com/content/12/1/15
| Received: | 19 November 2014 |
| Accepted: | 5 March 2015 |
| Published: | 1 April 2015 |
© 2015 Melville et al.; licensee BioMed Central.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Abstract
Background
Although abundant research has investigated the hormonal effects of d-aspartic acid
in rat models, to date there is limited research on humans. Previous research has
demonstrated increased total testosterone levels in sedentary men and no significant
changes in hormonal levels in resistance trained men. It was hypothesised that a higher
dosage may be required for experienced lifters, thus this study investigated the effects
of two different dosages of d-aspartic acid on basal hormonal levels in resistance
trained men and explored responsiveness to d-aspartic acid based on initial testosterone
levels.
Methods
Twenty-four males, with a minimum of two years’ experience in resistance training,
(age, 24.5 ± 3.2 y; training experience, 3.4 ± 1.4 y; height, 178.5 ± 6.5 cm; weight,
84.7 ± 7.2 kg; bench press 1-RM, 105.3 ± 15.2 kg) were randomised into one of three
groups: 6 g.d−1 plain flour (D0); 3 g.d−1 of d-aspartic acid (D3); and 6 g.d−1 of d-aspartic acid (D6). Participants performed a two-week washout period, training
four days per week. This continued through the experimental period (14 days), with
participants consuming the supplement in the morning. Serum was analysed for levels
of testosterone, estradiol, sex hormone binding globulin, albumin and free testosterone
was determined by calculation.
Results
D-aspartic acid supplementation revealed no main effect for group in: estradiol; sex-hormone-binding-globulin;
and albumin. Total testosterone was significantly reduced in D6 (P = 0.03). Analysis
of free testosterone showed that D6 was significantly reduced as compared to D0 (P = 0.005),
but not significantly different to D3. Analysis did not reveal any significant differences
between D3 and D0. No significant correlation between initial total testosterone levels
and responsiveness to d-aspartic acid was observed (r = 0.10, P = 0.70).
Conclusions
The present study demonstrated that a daily dose of six grams of d-aspartic acid decreased
levels of total testosterone and free testosterone (D6), without any concurrent change
in other hormones measured. Three grams of d-aspartic acid had no significant effect
on either testosterone markers. It is currently unknown what effect this reduction
in testosterone will have on strength and hypertrophy gains.
Keywords:
D-aspartic acid; Resistance training; Testosterone; Estradiol; SHBGBackground
The anabolic hormone testosterone is considered to be a key determinant of training
induced improvements in hypertrophy and strength. Circulating testosterone increases
other anabolic hormones and directly interacts with androgen receptors and satellite
cells, causing a cascade of events leading to protein synthesis and muscle growth
[1],[2]. Research has previously demonstrated correlations between testosterone levels and
training related strength gains [3],[4]. Furthermore exogenous elevation of testosterone to supraphysiological levels, via
administration of anabolic steroids has been shown to drastically improve strength
and hypertrophy [5]. Currently it is unknown whether boosting testosterone levels within normal physiological
levels (mid-range to upper-range) will have a significant effect on strength and hypertrophy.
Nonetheless, the supplement industry is endorsing testosterone boosters to improve
training related gains. D-aspartic acid is currently recommended as a viable product
to significantly raise testosterone, however research in humans only supports this
recommendation in untrained men with below average testosterone levels. Moreover there
is no information about the effect of different doses of d-aspartic acid on testosterone
levels in humans.
Aspartic acid (C4H7NO4) is an α-amino acid which is known to exist in two isoforms, l-aspartic acid and
d-aspartic acid. (2R)-2-aminobutanedioic acid or d-aspartic acid (DAA), previously
believed to be exclusive to brain tissue in octopus, squid and cuttlefish, has more
recently been shown to exist in mammals [6]. Free DAA is found in tissues and cells related to the central nervous and endocrine
systems [7],[8]. DAA is believed to stimulate the production and release of testosterone through
multiple pathways of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal (HPG) axis. It has been shown
to increase steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (StAR) gene expression in rat Leydig
cells [9]. StAR is a key regulator for the transport of cholesterol from outside the mitochondrial
membrane to the inner membrane [7]. By increasing levels of StAR DAA may indirectly increase testosterone, as the transportation
of cholesterol is believed to be the rate limiting step in the production of testosterone
[7]. In vitro rats studies demonstrated that DAA increased levels of testosterone, luteinizing
hormone, progesterone [6] and growth hormone [10]. This is believed to occur due to the accumulation of DAA in the anterior pituitary
and testes [10]. Additional in vitro studies on isolated rat testes [6] and Leydig cells [11] indicate that DAA increased the rate of testosterone synthesis in a dose dependent
manner. In these animals the maximal effective dose of DAA, which elicited the greatest
hormonal response (LH, testosterone and progesterone), was 1 μmol.g−1[6]. In humans the effects of different dosages of DAA on basal testosterone is unclear.
To date only two studies on DAA supplementation have been conducted on humans. Topo
et al. [12] demonstrated that after 12 days of supplementation (3.12 g.d−1), levels of testosterone were significantly increased by 42% (4.5–6.4 ng.ml−1). They recruited a cohort of healthy sedentary male IVF patients (27–37 years), with
low initial testosterone levels (~4.55 ng.ml−1). Contrastingly Willoughby and Leutholtz, reported that after 29 days of supplementation
(3 g.d−1) and resistance training, levels of total testosterone and free testosterone were
not significantly altered. In this study resistance trained men (age: 22.8 ± 4.67 years
old; training age: > 1 year) were recruited and this cohort exhibited higher initial
testosterone levels (~7.96 ng.ml−1) [13]. The difference in outcome between these two studies may in part be explained by
training status and accompanying basal testosterone levels. Basal testosterone levels
of RT men range from approximately 5.8–8.6 ng.ml−1 (20–30 nmol.l−1), [4],[14] and untrained men range from about 4.9–6.6 ng.ml−1 (17–23 nmol.l−1) [15]-[17]. Furthermore current research has only explored one dose response of DAA, 3 g.d−1[12],[13], hence the maximum effective dose for humans is yet to be determined.
Supplement companies are currently recommending three grams of DAA once to twice a
day, and these recommendations have been drawn from the only dosage studied in humans
(3 g.d−1). It is reasonable to believe that in RT males, a higher dose may be required to
further increase testosterone levels. As such the primary aim of this study was to
evaluate the effects of two doses of d-aspartic acid (3 g and 6 g) on basal testosterone
levels in resistance trained men. A secondary aim was to establish if a relationship
exists between initial testosterone levels and responsiveness to DAA. It was hypothesised
that; (a) testosterone levels would be unchanged in the 3 g group; (b) testosterone
levels would be increased in the 6 g group; and (c) lower initial testosterone levels
would correspond with an increased responsiveness to DAA.
Methods
Subjects
The institutional review board approved the study and participants provided written
informed consent prior to testing and participation. A total of twenty-four participants
from the local area completed this study (Table 1). To be eligible participants had to be: male; aged 18–36; have no acute or chronic
medical conditions; have the ability to bench press 100% bodyweight; and had been
performing regular resistance training exercise for at least three days per week for
the previous two years. None of the participants were supplementing their diet with
any ergogenic or testosterone booting supplements prior to testing. All participants
provided written consent and completed a medical history check. The study was approved
by the University of Western Sydney human research ethics committee, and carried out
in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki.
Table 1. Participant demographics
Experimental approach to the problem
This was a randomised, double-blinded, and placebo-controlled design to examine the
effects of d-aspartic acid supplementation on basal testosterone levels following
a two week supplementation protocol. Participants were assigned to one of three experimental
groups: placebo (D0), three grams of DAA (D3) and six grams of DAA (D6). All participants
consumed 10 opaque capsules each morning with breakfast for two weeks. They contained
either: six grams of flour (D0, n = 8); a mixture of three grams each of flour and
DAA (D3, n = 8); or six grams of DAA (D6, n = 8). Participants were randomly allocated
to treatment groups following a block randomisation procedure based on a computer-generated
list of random numbers. Placebo, mixed and supplement were provided in identical opaque
capsules to improve blinding. Group allocation was managed by a technical officer,
whilst investigators were kept blind to group assignment throughout the intervention.
All participants followed an upper/lower body split resistance training program for
a full month, with the initial two weeks of training (washout period) performed without
supplementation (Figure 1). Three timepoints were used to obtain testing data: T1, T2 and T3 (Figure 1).
Experimental procedures
Testing sessions consisted of a fasted blood draw, then 1-RM bench press evaluation.
Initial baseline blood measures were taken at two timepoints (T1 & T2) and averaged
to ensure accuracy in baseline assessment of these markers (Figure 1). After T1 prescribed training commenced for four weeks. After testing session T2
daily supplementation begun with training continuing as before. Post-measures were
taken after these last two weeks of training and supplementation, at the end of week
4 (Figure 1). The supplemental period of two weeks was chosen as this has been previously shown
to be a sufficient time period to see a change in total testosterone levels [12].
1-RM testing
Bench press dynamic strength one repetition max (1-RM) was measured before the standardisation
period (T1), beginning of experimental period (T2) and post experiment period (T3)
(Figure 1), as part of eligibility testing. Correct form included depth to the level of the
chest, with feet not leaving the floor, and the backside not leaving the bench at
any point during the repetition. The protocol for 1-RM testing involved one warm up
set of 10 reps at approximately 50% of their estimated 1-RM, followed by two more
warm ups at approximately 70% and 80% with only 1–2 reps. After the warm ups participants
attempted 1-RMs with incrementally increasing weight. The weight achieved prior to
the failed attempt was recorded as the 1-RM. A participant’s 1-RM was achieved within
five attempts and adequate rest between attempts was adhered to (3–5 mins) [18].
Fasted blood draws
All blood draws were obtained via venepuncture of the antecubital vein after a 12 hour
fast. Participants were also instructed to avoid strenuous exercise and alcohol consumption
the day before the draw. Blood draws were conducted by a trained phlebotomist and
subsequent draws were planned for the same time of morning (7:00–10:00 am) for each
particular participant, to prevent any effect of diurnal variation. Whole blood was
collected using serum separator tubes (SST™ II Advance, BD Vacutainer®). They were
then allowed to clot for 45 minutes and centrifuged using a fixed angle rotor centrifuge:
ADAMS® Compact II Centrifuge, V:227 (Becton Dickinson & Co) (828 × g, at 2700 rpm)
for 15 minutes in an air conditioned room (19°C). Serum was aliquoted and stored at
−80°C until analysis (Douglas Hanly Moir Pathology, Macquarie Park, NSW, Australia).
Single analysis of serum was conducted for total testosterone, estradiol, sex-hormone-binding-globulin
(SHBG) and albumin. Testosterone and SHBG was measured via electrochemiluminescent
(ECL) immunoassay, on a Roche E170 system (Roche Diagnostics). Albumin was measured
via bromocresol green (BCG) succinate buffer method, on an Abbott 16000. Estradiol
was measured via chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay on an Abbott i2000. Free
testosterone was calculated from total testosterone, SHBG and albumin.
Training standardisation
Participants trained for four days per week over a one month period. The prescribed
training for each exercise consisted of four sets of a repetition maximum range of
8–10. If the repetition range wasn’t met, participants were asked to lower or raise
the weight in the next session. Exercises during the upper body session were: barbell
bench press; overhand pulldown; barbell overhead press and underhand pulldown. The
lower body session consisted of: back squat; good morning; leg extensions; and straight
leg calf raises. Adherence was monitored via training diaries and supervised sessions
(minimum 1 × per week).
Dietary intake
Participants were asked to control their diet, by avoiding any major changes throughout
the study duration. To monitor their diet they were asked to weigh and recorded their
food intake for three days each of the first and last week; two training days and
one non-training day. These three days were averaged to get a daily mean for week
one and four. The food diaries were entered into CalorieKing (Australian Edition 4.0),
then analysed for caloric and macronutrient daily intakes (protein, carbohydrates
and fats) and normalised to bodyweight.
Statistical analysis
Analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows version 21.0 (Armonk,
NY: IBM Corp), and the level of significance was set at P < 0.05. Data are shown as
mean ± S.D. The distribution was tested for normality using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov
test. Paired sample statistics were run on total testosterone (TT), free testosterone
(FT), estradiol (E2), sex-hormone-binding-globulin (SHBG), and albumin (ALB) to determine the stability
of these blood measures over the standardisation period. As these measures were found
to be unchanged they were each computed (averaged) into one baseline measure. Univariate
analysis of the absolute change scores:
Δ=(T3−T1+T22) was conducted, with the baseline scores:
PRE=(T1+T22) as covariates (Figure 1). Pairwise comparisons with Bonferroni correction were performed if a group effect
was observed. To explore the responsiveness of the supplement, linear regression analysis
was conducted on the baseline and change scores of TT and FT, of the experimental
groups (n = 16).
Results
Analysis of the POST values revealed no main effect for group with E2 (P = 0.47), SHBG (P = 0.07) and ALB (P = 0.32). Post values of D6 TT were significantly
reduced (~12.5%) as compared to the pre values (P = 0.03; 5.9 to 5.1 ng.ml−1). FT in group D6 was significantly decreased (429.1 to 363.4 pmol.l−1) as compared to D0 (439.6 to 480.9 pmol.l−1) (P = 0.005) but not D3 (534.9 to 524.3 pmol.l−1) (P = 0.06) (Figure 2). Diet analysis revealed no significant changes in macronutrient (CHO: P = 0.74;
PRO: P = 0.99; FAT: P = 0.54) and caloric intakes (P = 0.64) during the study. Regression
analysis revealed no significant correlation between baseline total testosterone levels
and total testosterone change (r = 0.10, P = 0.70), and no significant correlation
between baseline free testosterone and free testosterone change (r = 0.32, P = 0.23).
Discussion
The primary findings of the current study were, 1) resistance trained men consuming
six grams of d-aspartic acid daily demonstrated significant reductions in total and
free testosterone after 14 days of d-aspartic acid supplementation, and 2) the responsiveness
to d-aspartic acid supplementation was unaffected by initial testosterone levels (total
or free) in resistance trained men.
Our results demonstrate that in resistance trained men three grams daily of d-aspartic
acid had no significant effect on total testosterone, estradiol, sex-hormone-binding-globulin,
and albumin. This is contrary to the evidence provided by Topo et al. [12], where the cohort consumed the same dose over 12 days and reported elevated total
testosterone levels (~42%). Baseline testosterone levels of the current study were
higher than values found in Topo et al. [12] (6.3 and 4.5 ng.ml−1 respectively), presumably because the cohort in the Topo et al. study were sedentary
[12]. In resistance training literature, total testosterone levels range from 5.8–8.6 ng.ml−1[4],[14] for trained individuals and 4.9–6.6 ng.ml−1 for untrained [15]-[17]. The increase in testosterone observed in Topo et al. [12] was likely due to the fact that testosterone levels were low enough for d-aspartic
acid to have an effect. In comparison our results in the D3 group mirror the results
seen in the study by Willoughby & Leutholtz [13], where the total testosterone levels fall within levels observed in resistance trained
males [4],[14].
It was observed in the six gram group that total testosterone was significantly reduced
from baseline by ~12.5%, with a parallel decrease in free testosterone ~15.3% (see
Table 2). Previous research has demonstrated that in resistance trained men, free testosterone
can increase due to training [19]. A reduction in calculated free testosterone in this study is due to a reduction
in total testosterone, an increase in the binding proteins or a combination of the
two occurring. Within the context of increasing total testosterone a maximum effective
dosage (MED) is observed in rat studies [6]. At the higher dosages there were significantly increased accumulation of d-aspartic
acid observed in the pituitary and testes [6]. A dose response increase in total testosterone was observed until 1 μmol.g−1. Each increase in dose past 1 μmol.g−1 the rise in testosterone was reduced [6]. It could be theorised that 6 g.d−1 may be affecting negative feedback mechanisms of the HPG axis, thus reducing pituitary
initiated production of luteinizing hormone and in turn testosterone levels. Furthermore
d-aspartic acid could also be over-accumulating within the testes. This may be creating
a disruptive effect on the mobilisation of cholesterol from the outer membrane to
the inner [7], which would attenuate testosterone production. As this was the first study to administer
a six gram dosage of d-aspartic acid, these mechanisms can only be speculated due
to the lack of data available on the utilisation of d-aspartic acid in humans.
Table 2. PRE (Baseline), POST (T3), and Change Scores (Δ) of hormonal markers
The reductions in testosterone observed in this study are important to consider, owing
to the negative impact it could have on training gains within this population. Resistance
trained men have higher levels of strength and hypertrophy compared to novice trainers
and also exhibit higher basal testosterone levels [4],[13]-[17], which suggest a link between basal total testosterone levels and training related
gains. A decrease in total testosterone with a concurrent decrease in free testosterone
could reduce the likelihood of interaction with androgen receptors in muscles and
nerves, which would reduce the speed of testosterone initiated muscle protein synthesis
[1]. Over time this could translate into reduced training gains. Conversely, alterations
of testosterone within normal physiological ranges may not be clinically significant.
Research indicates that when total testosterone levels are observed outside of normal
healthy ranges (4.9-8.6 ng.ml−1) it affects strength and hypertrophy. In the case of hypogonadism where testosterone
levels are low this negatively affects strength and hypertrophy, and with the use
of steroids a positive affect is seen [5],[20]. The changes observed in the current study reflect minor alterations with respect
to normal physiological ranges. It is currently unknown if these fluctuations are
detrimental to training gains.
A potential limitation of this research may be the study length. The short term nature
of a two week supplementation period will answer only acute hypotheses. The observed
reduction in testosterone may rebound, or even decrease further and a longer term
training study would be able to better explain the effects of this supplement. Moreover
it would be able to delineate changes in strength and or hypertrophy, and observe
whether d-aspartic acid affects training related gains positively or negatively.
Conclusion
Many testosterone boosting supplements are commercially available without sufficient
research to support their efficacy. The present study has demonstrated that 3 g.d−1 of d-aspartic acid was inadequate to affect any hormonal markers and that 6 g.d−1 significantly reduced total testosterone and free testosterone levels, with no concurrent
change in other hormones tested. It is currently unknown if any negative consequences
of this reduction, with respect to strength and hypertrophy will occur over time.
The need for longer-duration research utilising six grams of d-aspartic acid is clear.
Future research should explore supplementation of 6 g.d−1 over a longer period and observe any correlations between basal testosterone levels
and changes in hypertrophy and strength.
Competing interests
The d-aspartic acid supplement used in this study was commercially sourced. The authors
have no undisclosed professional relationships with companies or manufacturers that
would benefit from the results of the present study. The authors declare that they
have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
GM, PM and JS contributed to the study conception and design, GM acquired the data,
performed data analysis and interpreted the data; all authors were involved in drafting
the manuscript and have given final approval of the published version.
Acknowledgments
The author’s thank the volunteers who participated in the study.
References
-
Spiering BA, Kraemer WJ, Anderson JM, Armstrong LE, Nindl BC, Volek JS et al.. Resistance exercise biology: Manipulation of resistance exercise programme variables
determines the responses of cellular and molecular signalling pathways. Sports Med. 2008; 38(7):527-40. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
-
Vingren JL, Kraemer WJ, Ratamess NA, Anderson JM, Volek JS, Maresh CM. Testosterone physiology in resistance exercise and training: The up-stream regulatory
elements. Sports Med. 2010; 40(12):1037-53. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
-
Hakkinen K, Pakarinen A, Alen M, Kauhanen H, Komi PV. Neuromuscular and hormonal adaptations in athletes to strength training in two years. J App Physiol. 1988; 65(6):2406-12.
-
Hakkinen K, Pakarinen A, Alen M, Komi PV. Serum hormones during prolonged training of neuromuscular performance. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1985; 53(4):287-93. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
-
Bhasin S, Storer TW, Berman N, Callegari C, Clevenger B, Phillips J et al.. The effects of supraphysiologic doses of testosterone on muscle size and strength
in normal men. New Eng J Med. 1996; 335(1):1-7. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
-
D'Aniello A, Di Cosmo A, Di Cristo C, Annunziato L, Petrucelli L, Fisher G. Involvement of D-aspartic acid in the synthesis of testosterone in rat testes. Life Sci. 1996; 59(2):97-104. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
-
Furuchi T, Homma H. Free D-aspartate in mammals. Biol and Pharm Bull. 2005; 28(9):1566-70. Publisher Full Text
-
D'Aniello A. d-Aspartic acid: An endogenous amino acid with an important neuroendocrine role. Brain Res Rev. 2007; 53(2):215-34. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
-
Nagata Y, Homma H, Matsumoto M, Imai K. Stimulation of steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (StAR) gene expression by D-aspartate
in rat Leydig cells. FEBS Lett. 1999; 454(3):317-20. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
-
D'Aniello A, Di Fiore MM, Fisher GH, Milone A, Seleni A, D'Aniello S et al.. Occurrence of D-aspartic acid and N-methyl-D-aspartic acid in rat neuroendocrine tissues
and their role in the modulation of luteinizing hormone and growth hormone release. FASEB J. 2000; 14(5):699-714. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
-
Nagata Y, Homma H, Lee JA, Imai K. D-Aspartate stimulation of testosterone synthesis in rat Leydig cells. FEBS Lett. 1999; 444(2–3):160-4. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
-
Topo E, Soricelli A, D'Aniello A, Ronsini S, D'Aniello G: The role and molecular mechanism
of D-aspartic acid in the release and synthesis of LH and testosterone in humans and
rats. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2009, 7.
-
Willoughby DS, Leutholtz B. D-Aspartic acid supplementation combined with 28 days of heavy resistance training
has no effect on body composition, muscle strength, and serum hormones associated
with the hypothalamo-pituitary-gonadal axis in resistance-trained men. Nutr Res. 2013; 33(10):803-10. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
-
Hakkinen K, Pakarinen A, Alen M, Kauhanen H, Komi PV. Daily hormonal and neuromuscular responses to intensive strength training in 1 week. Int J Sports Med. 1988; 9(6):422-8. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
-
McCall GE, Byrnes WC, Fleck SJ, Dickinson A, Kraemer WJ. Acute and chronic hormonal responses to resistance training designed to promote muscle
hypertrophy. Can J App Physiol. 1999; 24(1):96-107. Publisher Full Text
-
Reaburn P, Logan P, Mackinnon L. Serum testosterone response to high-intensity resistance training in male veteran
sprint runners. J Strength Cond Res. 1997; 11(4):256-60.
-
Staron RS, Karapondo DL, Kraemer WJ, Fry AC, Gordon SE, Falkel JE et al.. Skeletal muscle adaptations during early phase of heavy-resistance training in men
and women. J App Physiol. 1994; 76(3):1247-55.
-
Marshall PWM, McEwen M, Robbins DW. Strength and neuromuscular adaptation following one, four, and eight sets of high
intensity resistance exercise in trained males. Eur J App Physiol. 2011; 111(12):3007-16. Publisher Full Text
-
Ahtiainen JP, Pakarinen A, Alen M, Kraemer WJ, Häkkinen K. Muscle hypertrophy, hormonal adaptations and strength development during strength
training in strength-trained and untrained men. Eur J App Physiol. 2003; 89(6):555-63. Publisher Full Text
-
Lunenfeld B, Arver S, Moncada I, Rees DA, Schulte HM. How to help the aging male? Current approaches to hypogonadism in primary care. Aging Male. 2012; 15(4):187-97. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text